Tuesday, July 27, 2010

Movie Reviews - Winter's Bone

Winter's Bone (2010)
Starring : Jennifer Lawrence, John Hawkes
Dir: Debra Granik
Writers: Debra Granik, Anne Rosellinni



It was a winner at the Sundance Film Festival, recieving the Grand Jury Prize and the Waldo Salt Screenwriting Award. It wasn't these awards that got me excited to see this film, rather it was that this film looked, far and away, better than 95% of the fare the entertainment industry has been spewing out so in 2010. I walked into the Winter's Bone expecting a fantastic film. What did I get? A reawakened love for noir dramas and questions a-plenty to keep me busy for days. This film, ladies and gentlemen, is the 2010 film messiah we have been waiting for.

Sunday, June 20, 2010

Review-Jonah Hex

Jonah Hex (2010)
Starring:
Josh Brolin, Megan Fox, John Malkovich
Dir: Jimmy Hayward
Writ: Mark Neveldine and Brian Taylor, based on comics by John Albano and Tony Dezuniga.


When I first heard of the existence of a Jonah Hex movie, adapted from the DC comics character, my initial reaction was “Why?” Don't get me wrong, I have nothing against the character; it just seems a little strange to me that out of the the entire pantheon of DC comics characters to choose from, a D-list unknown like Jonah Freakin' Hex got pushed through to the big screen. But we haven't even got a script for a Wonder Woman movie. Again, no ill will to Jonah, but the very notion of his movie seems unnecessary.

In an almost blissfully self-aware turn of events, unnecessary seems to be the name of the game in the film itself.

Wednesday, March 31, 2010

Hot Tub Time Machine Review

Hot Tub Time Machine (2010)
Starring: John Cusack, Rob Corddry, Craig T. Robinson, Clark Duke.
Dir: Steve Pink
Writ: Josh Heald & Sean Anders

Of all the things that can be said about MGM's buddy comedy "Hot Tub Time Machine", let me start with this: Not since "Snakes On A Plane" has a film presented its subject matter in such an honest and literal fashion.
Unlike "Snakes", however, "Hot Tub" goes beyond its initial four-word premise and manages to pull out a film that exceeds the expectations set by its title.

Tuesday, March 30, 2010

Welcome to Reel Money!

Welcome to Reel Money, where we tell you which movies in theaters and on DVD are worth your hard-earned cash, and which ones you shouldn't even let your friends pay to see.
Here's how it works: Using the average movie price of seven dollars, we rate movies not with thumbs or stars, but with actual monetary values, telling you whether a movie is worth paying for, and more importantly worth seeing again or owning. Generally speaking, the Final Total is the amount we feel a movie is worth in terms of paid viewings and purchase, for the lifetime of the film. In other words, a seven-dollar movie is probably worth seeing once, a twenty-seven dollar movie is worth seeing and owning, and so forth:
A Handy Chart
$0: A Zero-Money Movie. The worst of the worst. Don't even get this to satisfy your curiosity. Just move on.
$1-6: Well, if there's nothing else in the Redbox, then okay...
$7-10: Something's worth the price of admission. Once.
$10-20: Might be worth a second look, though maybe not immediately.
$20-40: Own-worthy, the only questions are when and what format.
$40-60: You've already seen this two or three times in theaters. Now go rush to buy the Blu-Ray on the Tuesday it's available.
$60+: If next year DVD/Blu-Ray were extinct, this film is worth buying again for whatever format comes next. Forever. That good.
So, stay awhile. Peruse our reviews, and enjoy our videos. We're always working to make this better, so feel free to contact us at reelmoneyreviews@gmail.com with any thoughts or comments! Make sure to tell your friends, and remember that at Reel Money, we pay so you won't have to!

The Princess and The Frog Review

NOTE: This review is a repost from the first Reel Money Site. It was placed here to be included in our new archives. 

Invictus Review

NOTE: This review is a repost from the first Reel Money Site. It was placed here to be included in our new archives. 

 Invictus (2009)
Starring:
Morgan Freeman, Matt Damon, Tony Kgorge
Dir
: Clint Eastwood Written by: Anthony Peckham, screenplay, based on a book by John Carlin.

Zombieland Review

NOTE: This review is a repost from the first Reel Money Site. It was placed here to be included in our new archives. 

 Zombieland (2009)
Starring:
Jesse Eisenberg, Woody Harrelson, Emma Stone, Abigail Breslin.
Dir: Ruben Fletcher
Written by: Rhett Reese & Paul Wernick.


Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince Review

NOTE: This review is a repost from the first Reel Money Site. It was placed here to be included in our new archives. 

 Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince(2009)
Starring
: Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint, Emma Watson,Tom Felton, Michael Gambon, Alan Rickman
Dir: David Yates
Writers: Steve Kloves, based off novel by JK Rowling.

When approaching books based off novels, especially highly popular, beloved ones like the Harry Potter franchise, it's natural, if not ill-recommended  to draw comparisons between the two works. However, this franchise has had five movies in which to demonstrate that they are entirely different beasts than their literary predecessors, and we should assess them as such. And so it came to be that the one book from the series I truly despised became my favorite film.

Right from the beginning, director David Yates makes it quite clear that the tone of the movies has changed, and the rules have as well. No amusing Dursley abuse for us in the opening frames, instead we get a kidnapping and an act of wizard terrorism. Our first look at Harry shows that he's changed as well, hanging around train stations against Dumbledore's advice and hitting on waitresses. (This of course leads to a magical cock-blocking by Dumbledore.) It's clearly a darker, more cynical chapter in the Potterverse, and while not subtle about it at all, the cast carries this idea out with aplomb.

(Note: I'd really like it if someone were to find a way to make sure I go down in history as the first critic to ever use the phrase "magical cock-blocking" in a review.)

My biggest complaint with Half-Blood Prince, the book, was that it was the part of the series when everything became about relationships. It's this way in the movie as well, but it goes a bit deeper in the changing relationships of its characters than just their dating lives. The biggest evolution is the relationship between Harry and Dumbledore, one described by Radcliffe himself as transitioning from teacher-student to that of a general and his favorite lieutenant. Both Radcliffe and Gambon understand that, and as a result, their scenes together are spectacular. Of course, romantic relationships rear their head in the film as well. Ron gets a clingy girlfriend (played to neurotic hilarity by Jessie Cave) , much to Hermione's jealousy, and previously undocumented chemistry between Harry and Ginny Weasly pops up, basically out of nowhere. It's not handled poorly, though, mainly thanks to the talented young cast's ability to act like actual teenagers.

Which leads to the next reason the film succeeds. Since the series' beginning, people have debated the staying power of the young stars, basically wondering if they will ever be able to be anything other than the Harry Potter kids for their entire careers. In Half-Blood Prince, the caliber of acting is brought to an all-time high, showing the answer to be a definite "yes.". During some of the film's lighter moments, Radcliffe and Grint provide some of the most hilarious performances I've seen in a teen movie, Watson tones down her demeanor to show some real emotion, but the biggest surprise in the film is Tom Felton's portrayal of reluctant villian Draco Malfoy. After not having much to do in the last few films, Felton gets more of the spotlight in Half Blood Prince. His performance is mostly silent, spending much of his screentime alone, brooding. To his credit, though, it never stops being engaging. His character's conflict and turmoil is shown clearly in almost every scene, and he never has to say a word.

Half-Blood Prince is certainly the most intense in the magical series thus far, though towards the end the pacing starts to feel rushed. There's a lot happening here, and even with a run time of nearly two and a half hours, there's not enough time to get it all in. Even the film's climax, and a moment that should be wrought with emotion feels pushed through to bring the film to a large cliffhanger ending. Much like the book, this is very much "Harry Potter 7: Part 1" but even with it's rush to the finish, it feels complete. In the end, the main difference comes down to this: the film works because the characters and performances are rich and believable. Radcliffe, Grint, Watson and Felton are better at portraying conflicted teens than Rowling was at writing them.

Final Total: $30. An amazingly enjoyable, well-acted film that's definately got re-watchability, I still probably wouldn't rush right out and buy it on DVD immediately, rather wait until after Deathly Hallows has been released to try to catch a package deal.

My Sister's Keeper Review

NOTE: This review is a repost from the first Reel Money Site. It was placed here to be included in our new archives. 

My Sister's Keeper (2009)
Starring: Cameron Diaz, Abigail Breslin, Alec Baldwin, Sofia Vassilieva, Joan Cusack
Dir: Nick Cassavetes
Written by: Cassavetes, Jeremy Leven, adapated from a novel by Jodi Picoult.

My Sister's Keeper, the latest from The Notebook director Nick Cassavettes, tries to be a drama on three levels. It tries to play the role of a hospital drama, a courtroom drama, and a family drama. It ultimately fails at all three.

Keeper tells the story of Anna Fitzgerald, played by Abigail Breslin, an 11-year old girl who was a biologically designed test tube baby, brought into the world to provide blood and marrow donations for her sister Kate (Vassilieva), who is dying of Leukemia. When Kate's kidneys go into renal failure, Anna hires a lawyer, played by Alec Baldwin, to sue her parents for medical emancipation,essentially, the right to decide what happens to her own body. Cameron Diaz plays Sara, the girls' mother, fighting for control in the struggle for her daughters' life.

Unfortunately, the film can't just stay in one place, telling one story about a possibly interesting legal drama. It wanders from point to point, adding sideplot after sideplot, until the film becomes one giant muddled mess. It relies heavily on gimmicks such as voice-overs and flashbacks, never a good move for a heavy drama, and because every other scene transition is a basic fade to black, it becomes impossible to discern what is taking place as part of the main story and what is a moment in the past. The transitions which aren't are often quick cuts in what appears to be the middle of the scene, leaving a dialouge or a moment of action seeming unfinished. Even the best movies are guilty of this type of misedit, (The Dark Knight had an amazing one) but in Keeper, it's almost continuous, and jarring each time it happens, removing the viewer from a story they were barely hanging onto in the first place.

The voiceovers here pose another problem. Quite simply, a voice over works best at the beginning and at the end of a movie. With comic book and detective stories being the exception, if you can't tell a story with what's happening on the screen, you don't have a story worth teliing. The voice-overs ere are not only constant, they are numerous. Every single character gets at least one, and often they go on forever, with absolutely nothing happening onscreen. Even Alec Baldwin's lawyer character, Cambell Alexander gets one. He also gets an ill-concieved subplot involving a disease of his own that is dealt with briefly, then removed, making no real difference to the story.

As a matter of fact, most of the film is irrelevant to the story. The girls have a brother (Evan Ellingston) whose story arc is almost completely forgettable, and a father (Jason Patric) who is allowed two or three important scenes, then shuffled away for the rest of the film. Barring the useless characters, there are also plenty of pop music montages that trod on forever and make the film seem less like a serious drama and more like a very special episode of One Tree Hill.

Most of the performances in this film fall stiff, as though Diaz and Breslin are the only ones really trying, and Breslin the only one succeeding. Even Baldwin and Cusack come across as awkward and aloof when acting alongside the young lady, though the two are great in what little courtroom scenes they get. The drama doesn't work, the characters don't connect, and the whole thing is awkward and poorly edited. For Cassavetes, whose most noteworthy film  The Notebook I truly enjoyed, you have to wonder, why even bother?

Final Total: $5. This sappy, generic tearjerker has value bin written all over it. Breslin's performance is impressive, but if you buy a movie ticket for an 11 year old girl, you've got bigger issues.

Bruno Review

NOTE: This review is a repost from the first Reel Money Site. It was placed here to be included in our new archives.

Bruno (2009)
Starring: Sacha Baron Cohen
Director: Larry Charles.
Writers: Sacha Baron Cohen, Anthony Hines

This is one of the few times I really wish I knew how to type the Umlaut.

Sacha Baron Cohen has made a career out of exposing people to themselves. In Borat, he created a character so bizarre and unusual that it angered people, only to show what people become when they don't understand something. For his role in Talledega Nights: The Legend of Ricky Bobby, he got an entire crowd of NASCAR fans to boo the antagonist's car by having the announcer say it was French. They didn't even know they were part of a fictional movie. Cohen knows people, and how to push their buttons. He understands society more than many sociologists, and what he has to show us is disheartening, at times downright terrifying.

This time Cohen parades out one of his lesser known characters from the Ali G show, Austrian fashion show host Bruno, a flaming homosexual with a desire for fame. From the very first minutes of the movie, Cohen is outlandish as possible, making a public spectacle, and including a scene recreating various gay sex acts, as if to say "Hey, if you can't make it through the first ten minutes here, you're not prepared for this movie." There are a few amusing bits, and a many moments that not only toe the line of good taste, they obliterate the very notion such a line exists. I'm not a fan of being outrageous for outrage's sake, and I quickly got the feeling that this was what Bruno was spiraling into. The film plays like a series of sketches, each one trying to top the last in terms of controversy.The viewer finds themselves on the verge of leaving the theater, but staying in their seats to see what is going to happen next. Then, after a trip to the Middle East, the viewer starts waiting to see if Cohen is going to be killed.

Where the film shines, however, when Cohen takes a backseat and lets people be people, giving them outrageous situations and letting them react in ways that are both amusing and horrifying, and in one case involving showing what a parent is willing to put their baby through for a modeling job, downright sickening. The film makes a turnaround when Bruno decides to attempt to become straight, and Cohen takes us on a journey through the Deep South. Bruno meets with two gay-converting pastors, goes hunting, and attends a very awkward swingers party. The latter half of the film fills you with laughter, even if it is of the Oh-My-God-This-Is-Terrible-Why-Am-I-Laughing variety. In the end, the film is funny because these are real people, and occasionally Cohen ruins a possibly classic scene, by going too over-the-top and detracting from his own scene. That said, the films climax, a UFC  style cage match hosted by Bruno had me in stitches, and also genuinely frightened for the filmmaker.

This is probably the point Cohen is going for. Why was I more afraid during a scene featuring a bunch of Southern wrestling fans than I was the scene with a supposed terrorist leader? More importantly, why was I so afraid that the guy in the theater behind me was enjoying the film for all the wrong reasons? Taken as a documentary, Bruno is both hilarious and thought-provoking, akin to the works f Michael Moore. But when unfunny, unnecessary scenes of Bruno's flamboyancy get in the way, they detract from what would otherwise be one of the most raw, real, untapped looks at America society in cinema.

Final total: $15. The film would definitely be worth a second viewing from me, if only to catch anything I may have missed the first time. A DVD extra showing the moments when Cohen revealed himself to people might raise the price for me, but as is, two tickets is all this film is really worth.